The REAl Size Of The LOCH NESS MONSTER
September 13th 2007 10:01
Many people in Scotland and all over the world have been fascinated with the idea of the Loch Ness Monster and the possibility of it's existence.
It was calculated some time ago that If the Loch Ness monster truly exists, it could only be about as big as a 12 year old as there is only enough fish in the loch to feed a 31 kg (about 67 lb) creature.
Scientists used sonar to estimate the number of fish in the lake and came up with an annual food supply of 93 kg. Since a cold blooded animal like Nessie would need to eat about three times its body weight each year, it could only weigh about 31 kg.
It was calculated some time ago that If the Loch Ness monster truly exists, it could only be about as big as a 12 year old as there is only enough fish in the loch to feed a 31 kg (about 67 lb) creature.
Scientists used sonar to estimate the number of fish in the lake and came up with an annual food supply of 93 kg. Since a cold blooded animal like Nessie would need to eat about three times its body weight each year, it could only weigh about 31 kg.
| 145 |
| Vote |
subscribe to this blog

















Comment by Anonymous
Comment by James Rickard
unlucky_ fishermen.com
Angling Fish
Check this out...
Comment by Michaelie
Flick Wit
Michaelie
Comment by AmyHuang
Project Job Search
Travel Debate
Travel String
Love Adventures
Comment by Anonymous
Comment by jenna
Comment by jenna
Comment by Anonymous
Comment by Ninjap00
Comment by Anonymous
Comment by Anonymous
Comment by Anonymous
Comment by Anonymous
Comment by Anonymous
Comment by Anonymous
there is a chance of the loch ness monster existing in the past when st.colomba saw it back 1400years ago, but that would have been a plesiosaurus.
Comment by toeloopyaka tiffany
Comment by Monsterhunter123
Better luck next time
Comment by Anonymous
Comment by Anonymous
Comment by Anonymous
Comment by Anonymous
Comment by Anonymous
Comment by Anonymous
Comment by Anonymous
Comment by Billy
Comment by Anonymous
Comment by MiSsYMichelle
it could still exist because scientists only calculated that it could eat up to 3 times its own weight.
what if it doesnt eat fish?
ro even if it did... they don't know how much it eats anyway.
like th ehumpback whale, it may eat plankton or krill or somethink small like that
it doesnt nessacrarily have to go along with scientists ideas.
they just dont want extra investigation work
Comment by youknowi
Comment by Anonymous
Comment by Anonymous
Comment by Anonymous
Comment by Anonymous
Comment by Anonymous
RESOURCES:
Really Long Link
Comment by Anonymous
its not an elephant if it was it would have felt uncomfortable and emerged from under water and if it was an elephat there would be coonstant sightings aas it would need to breath and what are the chances of an amphibian elephant plewase tell me?
I think the monster is reaal there are many caves the loch is oone of the deepest ones on earth so sonar wont reach the bottom plus it is connected to another source of water so it could hide there and feed there whenever it wants to.
Comment by Anonymous
Comment by Anonymous
Comment by Anonymous
if you made him mad he would kill you.their is animals that they just want to play with others.they seem wild but their not animals for me look wild but their not they want to play.but steal my favorite animals are dogs a doberman,snake and a lion they are wild.writing a paragraph takes you up to 20 minutes.ok my name is Victor Davila i live in California i go to spruce elementary school time:1:28
Comment by Anonymous
Regarding the discussion about whether Nessy is a herbavore or carnivore and the quantity of fish that exist in the lake I think that in either case it would require an animal to feed in rather shallow water on a fairly regular basis; aquatic plant life needs sunlight and even in very clear water there is still a limit to how deep adequate plant life can grow to nourish a very large animal. Most fish that would be fed on by Nessy would also tend to congregate in areas of vegitation because that vegitation provides oxygen, cover, and food - so this would suggest that Nessy should be seen a lot more frequently, both by local people and especially by those specifically looking for it.
Gary in the US
Comment by Anonymous
Duh!
Comment by Anonymous
Comment by Anonymous
Comment by ted
so now that we understand that the picture is fake #which has nothing really to do wiht the article# i will move on to the bulk of my argument. nessie doesn't exist. nessie is twelve #we know that from the reported amount of fish that it can consume #plesiosaurs are carniverous## therefore the animal most of had two #and in remote cases one# parent, as all animals at this point in time. suposing that the animal photoed in the famous picture was a plesiosuar, and not an eliphant #regarding the person who said that the eliphant theory was fake, becuase the eliphant would have emerged, for air, and thus be sighted. well you have been mislead by the main stream media who misworded it to sound as though nessie and the eliphant were on in the same. i beleave that the media ment to say that the animal in the photo could have been an eliphant, which either was let out into the water and photographed, and then got out of the water. the eliphant isn't aquatic.# the animal must have died roughly twelve years ago, becuase two large monsters would have easily killed of the population of fish. now what happens to dead bodies? yes they float. so when the pleasiasuars die, they must float upwards and be discovered.
lastly plesiosuars, have no abilty to lift up there necks into the position shown in the famous eliphant photo. without a large tail for counter weight the neck would have pullled the animal under the water, so that the head was barly out of the water, and the tail as well.
palentoligests sugest that brotosuars had trouble keeping there heads up high, blood flow would have been nearly impossable if the neck remained verticle for to long. the brontosuars probably ate of of the lower branches of trees. why might the brontosuarus have the long neck you ask?
becuase it was nessisary counterbalence which was nessisary with the long tail, which was probably for defensive purposes. it all comes down to the fact that the plesiosuar isn't what is in that photo. I also doubt that it is what is in that lake #there probably is nothing#.
Comment by Anonymous
Comment by Anonymous
Comment by Anonymous
Comment by Anonymous
Comment by Anonymous